China’s rural-urban divide, tax system weigh down economic potential, former official says

The third plenum of the Central Committee of China’s Communist Party, scheduled for next month, is expected to set the tone for the country’s economic policy for the next several years. In advance of that meeting, the Post is reviewing the work of notable scholars and observers about their own expectations – as well as their thoughts on China’s economy at large. The first part of this series can be found here, and the second here.

China should narrow gaps in its treatment of urban and rural inhabitants, better protect private property and overhaul its tax system to ease a number of socioeconomic issues, said a former official with the country’s top economic planner.

These changes are essential to resolving “imbalances” linked to “incomplete” market reforms, said Xu Lin, once the general director of financial and budgetary affairs for the National Development and Reform Commission.

Xu named the most pervasive of these imbalances as those between urban and rural China, those between regions, those among industries and the disparity between levels of consumption and investment.

“The reason for these imbalances is the same,” Xu said in an interview with the Post. “My personal view is that marketisation hasn’t been fully realised … Reforms need to take another step forward to let the market have a definitive effect on resource allocation.”

Xu made his case as the Communist Party prepares for the third plenum of its Central Committee, scheduled for July. The committee is expected to release a plan to shore up the economy as erratic figures for factory activity, property purchases and consumer spending threaten to dampen the country’s post-pandemic recovery.

One change Xu deemed necessary was the cancellation of the hukou, a system of household registration that restricts access to certain public services among migratory populations, most commonly those who move from China’s rural areas to urban centres looking for work.

The scheme, in place since 1958 as a means of managing population shifts, once forced rural Chinese to register with government offices before living formally in a city – and barred the unregistered from getting certain jobs or sending their children to local schools.

Despite some relaxations since the 1980s, migrants from the countryside still may not qualify for certain social services. Today’s version of the policy, Xu said, maintains a divide between urban and rural regions while allowing for “discriminatory treatment” related to the provision of those services.

Entrepreneurs and private property rights also need more protection, Xu said. To stimulate innovation in China, he suggested reducing “arbitrariness by public security, judicial and government departments in the handling of private property rights”.

Taxation rates and the national budgets, Xu said, need to be prepared “in a more scientific and reasonable manner”. In particular, he added, China should cut the tax “burden” on companies and make the system more “internationally competitive”.

On the budgetary side, he called for effective control of the “disorderly expansion of local government debt” and a greater proportion of state coffers allocated to social welfare.

Beijing has tried to control a surge in local government debt by stopping infrastructure projects in some provinces and providing funds through the issuance of special bonds.

Today, more than half of China’s tax revenue comes from duties levied on consumption. Corporate and personal income tax, meanwhile, make up just over a third, reflecting a long-term focus on investment rather than consumption.

Xu, now 62, joined the State Development Planning Commission in 1989 and later took up his post at the National Development and Reform Commission. He joined the China-US Green Fund in 2018 and serves as the private equity investment vehicle’s chairman.

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Pioneer Newz is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a Comment