Acer Swift X 14 vs. MacBook Pro 14: an RTX 4070 for the win

If you’re reading this comparison, we’ll assume that you don’t have a strong preference between macOS and Windows 11. If you do, then there’s little here that will sway you in a different direction.

What does matter is relative build qualities, and here, the MacBook Pro 14 has a distinct advantage. It’s one of the best-built laptops you can buy today, crafted from a CNC machine chunk of aluminum. It’s incredibly solid and exudes quality. The Swift X 14 is also well-built, though, with its own aluminum chassis and lid that resists bending, flexing, and twisting. It’s not that the Swift X 14 isn’t a very solid laptop, it’s just that the MacBook Pro 14 is that much better. For most people, though, there’s not enough of a difference to justify a lot more money.

The MacBook Pro 14 is a smaller laptop, in width, depth, and particularly thickness. It’s also slightly heavier, which gives it a denser feel. The Swift X 14 by comparison is a bit chunky. That contributes to the MacBook having a more elegant aesthetic, which is compounded by its simpler lines and overall design compared to the Swift X 14’s more rocket-science lines and venting. Again, the Swift X 14 isn’t bad, it’s just that the MacBook is better.

The MacBook’s Magic Keyboard is also better, if you appreciate shallower switches that are light and snappy and larger keycaps with more key spacing. If you like deeper travel, then the Swift X 14’s keyboard is also good, although its keycaps are smaller and there’s not as much spacing. The MacBook’s Force Touch haptic touchpad is a bigger difference, though, compared to the Swift X 14’s more pedestrian mechanical version.

In terms of connectivity, the Swift X 14 has more ports and greater legacy support, while the MacBook Pro 14 has an additional Thunderbolt 4 port, a full-size SD card reader, and a separate MagSafe 3 power connector. Both have the same level of wireless connectivity.

Finally, both laptops have 1080p webcams that provide good but not great image quality. The Swift X 14’s Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the Intel Meteor Lake chipset supports Microsoft’s Studio Effects software and so has hardware-assisted blurring, facial tracking, and other tools. Both laptops have fingerprint readers embedded in their power buttons for logging in without a password.

The Swift X 14 can be configured with the 28-watt Core Ultra 7 155H with 16 cores (six Performance, eight Efficient, and two Low Power Efficient) and 22 threads and with either the entry-level Nvidia GeForce RTX 4050 or the much faster RTX 4070, the latter of which is unusual in non-gaming 14-inch Windows laptops. That compares to the MacBook Pro 14 that can run the base M3 with eight CPU cores and 10 GPU cores, the M3 Pro with up to 12 CPU cores and 18 GPU cores, and the M3 Max with up to 16 CPU cores and 40 GPU cores.

We tested the Swift X 14 with the RTX 4070. We tested the MacBook Pro 14 with the M3 Max 16/40, and the MacBook Air M3 is put in as a proxy for the base MacBook Pro 14 model, which would be slightly faster given the Pro’s better thermals. In our CPU benchmarks, the M3 Max was much faster across the board. We didn’t run the latest version of the Pugetbench Premiere Pro on the 14-inch MacBook Pro, but the 16-inch model that’s only slightly faster scored 8,046. The base M3 was slower than the Swift X 14.

It’s likely that when similarly configured, that is, when compared to the MacBook Pro 14 M3 Pro, the Swift X 14 would be a competitive laptop that’s as fast for demanding productivity users and creators and faster for gamers. And it will cost significantly less.

The Swift X 14 has one display option, a 16:10 2.8K (2880 by 1800) OLED panel running at 120Hz. The MacBook Pro 14 also has one display option, a 16:10 3024-by-1964 mini-LED panel also running at 120Hz. On paper, the MacBook’s display is considerably sharper.

By every objective measure other than brightness, the Swift X 14’s OLED display is superior to the MacBook Pro 14’s mini-LED display. It has wider and more accurate colors, and its contrast is higher with inky blacks. Where the MacBook wins is in its intense, 1,600-nit high dynamic range (HDR) brightness. For media consumers and anyone else who’s concerned about great HDR performance, the MacBook Pro wins.

Audio is a completely different story. The Swift X 14 has just two upward-firing speakers that produce passable sound. The MacBook Pro 14 has a standout six-speaker setup with force-cancelling woofers that produces loud, incredibly clear sound with more bass than most laptops.

The MacBook Pro 14 is smaller and roughly the same weight as the Swift X 14, making it a denser laptop. Both are reasonably portable, though.

Battery life is another massive win for the MacBook Pro 14, which is one of the most efficient laptops you can buy today. Where the Swift X 14 managed just 7.25 hours in our web browsing and video tests, the MacBook Pro 14 with the M3 Max 16/40 should come in around 17 hours and 25 hours, respectively.

Simply put, while the Swift X 14 will last well under four hours when running intensive tasks, the MacBook Pro 14 can last for a full day or more. It’s not contest.

However, Windows users with less money to spend can’t go wrong with the Swift X 14. It’s the fastest non-gaming Windows 14-inch machine, has an excellent OLED display, and it’s built well enough that you’ll be glad you spend a lot less money for it.

Editors’ Recommendations