Acer Swift X 14 (2024) review: huge performance for cheap

Overall, though, that’s not as detrimental as it might sound. The Steel Gray color scheme carries through fairly consistently, with only a chrome Acer logo on the lid breaking it up. It’s overall a conservative look — it’s not just as sleek and “fashionable” as some other 14-inch options. Probably the one aspect that detracts are the plastic display bezels, which aren’t overlay large, but look a bit old school.

The build quality is very good, with no bending, flexing, or twisting in the all-aluminum chassis, lid, or keyboard deck. It’s not quite as rigid as the XPS 14, but I can’t complain. The hinge opens smoothly, albeit without the same feel as Dell’s dual-clutch version. While the Swift X 14 is lighter than the XPS 14 at 3.4 pounds versus 3.7 pounds, it’s considerably thicker at up to 0.80 inches versus 0.71 inches. It’s also slightly wider and deeper. The MacBook Pro 14 is a little heavier than the Acer at 3.6 pounds, but thinner than both it and the Dell at 0.61 inches. That makes the Swift X 14 a reasonably portable machine, but not quite as thin as some of its direct competitors.

The Swift X 14 isn’t the most attractive, modern, or svelte 14-inch laptop around. But it’s more than good enough, particularly when considering its reasonable price.

Keyboard and mouse

The keyboard is a quality entry, with slightly small keycaps, but plenty of key spacing. The switches are the tiniest bit firm, but still springy and precise. I found it comfortable enough while typing this review and easier to get used to than the XPS 14’s zero-lattice keyboard, which has less key travel. The MacBook’s Magic Keyboard remains my favorite with its equally shallow keys, but incredibly snappy and precise switches.

The touchpad is large enough to be comfortable, which a precise swiping surface and quiet, confident clicks. It’s as good as most mechanical touchpads, but premium laptops are moving toward haptic touchpads , which I like a lot better. The XPS 14’s hidden haptic touchpad is very good, and once again, the MacBook’s Force Touch haptic touchpad remains the industry standard for a reason.

Acer does not offer a touchscreen with the Swift X 14. While many people don’t care, I do prefer a touch display. So, I missed one here.

The Swift X 14 is a rare breed of laptop. There aren’t many non-gaming 14-inch machines that can be configured with an RTX 4070, and as stressed throughout this review, Acer’s biggest competitor is the XPS 14. While the XPS 14 uses the same 28-watt Core Ultra 7 155H chipset, which has 16 cores (six Performance, eight Efficient, and two Low Power Efficient) and 22 threads, it’s only available with the much slower RTX 4050.

Both laptops have a system thermal design power (TDP) of 80 watts, which affects the Acer more than the Dell. The RTX 4070 can take up to 115 watts, while the RTX 4050 takes a maximum of 50 watts. That means that the XPS 14 can give both the CPU and GPU their full power (not counting Turbo Power), while the Swift X 14 has to balance things a little more carefully by giving 30 watts to the CPU and 50 watts to the GPU. And it should be noted that the Swift X 14 is still a 14-inch laptop with less thermal headroom than the 16-inch machines where you typically find the RTX 4070.

That means that performance will naturally be more limited even with the Acer’s very aggressive cooling system that has fans that speed up quite a bit in performance and turbo modes. Some 16-inch machines, like the Samsung Galaxy Book4 Ultra and Dell XPS 16, also limit power to 80 watts (60 watts to their RTX 4070s), while the Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 gives 130 watts to its RTX 4060 and 45-watt Core Ultra 9 185H chipset. It’s the leader among Windows laptops.

We reviewed the XPS 14 with the slightly faster Core Ultra 7 165H, so it would be just slightly slower in CPU-intensive tasks with the Core Ultra 7 155H that you can configure today.

As we see in our benchmarks, the Swift X 14 is competitive with the 16-inch Windows laptops, outside of the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14, a bona fide gaming laptop. It’s much faster across the board than the XPS 14 in all but Geekbench 6. Most importantly, it’s 46% faster than the XPS 14 in the PugetBench Premiere Pro benchmark that runs in a live version of Adobe’s Premiere Pro video-editing application. In Windows, that creative app uses the GPU to speed up various tasks, and the Swift X 14’s much faster GPU makes it a speedier creative workstation than the XPS 14.

Overall, these are impressive results for a non-gaming 14-inch laptop. The MacBook Pro 14 with the M3 Max chipset is much faster (I’m using the MacBook Pro 16’s scores in this comparison, but the 14-inch model is roughly as fast), but the MacBook is also a lot more expensive.

With an RTX 4070, you might be expecting to game on the Swift X 14. While it runs Nvidia’s Studio drivers that optimize for creative and other apps and not gaming, the Swift X 14 can indeed serve as a very good 1080p gaming machine and is even reasonably fast at 1440p.

We didn’t run the XPS 14 through our series of gaming benchmarks because its RTX 4050 is too limiting. So, I’ll compare the Swift X 14 to some 16-inch laptops. In the 3DMark Time Spy test, the Swift X 14 was ahead of the XPS 16, but behind the Samsung Galaxy Book4. The Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 was quite a bit faster. In Red Dead Redemption 2, the Swift X 14 was again slightly slower across the board, but still quite playable. And in Cyberpunk 2077 at 1440p and ultra graphics with FSR 2.1 set to Quality, the Swift X 14 was surprisingly fast.

You’ll get even better performance if you drop down to 1080p. And you’ll enjoy the OLED display’s quality and the 120Hz refresh rate for tear-free gaming.

There’s a 76 watt-hour battery inside the Swift X 14, mated with a reasonably efficient Core Ultra 7 155H chipset and a high-resolution OLED display. In my experience, that combination doesn’t yield the best battery life.

In our web-browsing test, the Swift X 14 managed just 7.25 hours cycling through a series of complex webpages. It’s a reasonably taxing test that gives an idea of how long the laptop will last with a minimal workload. In our video test that loops through a local FHD video, the Swift X 14 lasted for just 7.25 hours as well, where most laptops last 10 hours or more.

Those aren’t the best results I’ve seen, but they’re not the worst, either. The XPS 14 with its OLED display was better tat 8.25 hours and 10 hours, respectively. Overall, the Swift X 14 doesn’t project to last nearly a full day of a typical workflow, and if you’re using the RTX 4070, it won’t last for more than a couple of hours. The king of battery life in this class is the MacBook Pro 14, which lasts at least twice as long and can make it through much of a full day of demanding work.

The Swift X 14 has one display option, a 14.5-inch 16:10 2.8K (2880 x 1800) OLED panel running at 120Hz. It’s drop-dead gorgeous out of the box, as with all OLED displays I’ve reviewed, and makes a great first impression with bright, dynamic colors and inky blacks.

According to my colorimeter, there’s nothing to complain about. Brightness was great at 405 nits, colors were wide at 100% of sRGB, 95% of AdobeRGB, and 100% of DCI-P3, and they were accurate at a Delta-E of 0.87 (less than 1.0 is considered excellent). And contrast was extremely high at 13,920:1 with perfect blacks. This is slightly better than the XPS 14’s OLED display option, which wasn’t as bright at 374 nits and didn’t have the same color gamut coverage at 85% of AdobeRGB and 97% of DCI-P3.

For a creator that seeks a color-accurate display that matches up with very good performance in a 14-inch laptop, the Swift X 14 fits the bill. And for media consumers who want great HDR performance, it’s also a great option. Only the MacBook Pro 14’s mini-LED display is likely to be notably better.

The audio isn’t quite as much of a standout. Two front-firing speakers provide OK sound, with sufficient volume and clear mids and highs. But the bass is lacking, giving the XPS 14 and, even more so, the excellent six-speaker setup with force-canceling woofers in the MacBook Pro 14, a clear win.

The Swift X 14 isn’t the best-looking 14-inch laptop. In fact, it’s sort of clunky and not entirely modern. But that’s OK, because it’s a really fast laptop with a spectacular OLED display. It’s one of the more portable and affordable laptops for doing real creative work.

The fact that it’s also more reasonably priced than some alternatives is what makes it a very attractive laptop. Yes, you can buy less expensive 14-inch laptops, but you won’t get this kind of performance. That makes the Swift X 14 an easy laptop to recommend.

Editors’ Recommendations