Political clashes, living pressures crash Taiwanese leader Lai’s ratings

Cabinet spokesman Chen Shih-kai said the timing of the request “will depend on the president’s promulgation of the laws”.

Observers warned that the confrontation would not only significantly affect the administration of the new Taiwanese leader William Lai Ching-te, but also his popularity.

Anticipating defeat, DPP lawmakers had already vowed to take the case to the island’s constitutional court, promising to seek a ruling from the grand justices on whether the bills violate the constitution.

The reform bills give lawmakers greater oversight powers of the executive branch, including an expansion of their investigative authority, that would operate in a similar way to the US Congress.

Public officials and civil servants who refuse to provide information when questioned by lawmakers, or who make false statements in hearings, would be committing a “contempt of the legislature” and subject to a fine of up to NT$200,000 (US$6,170).

The laws also empower legislators to request information and documents from government agencies, the military, legal entities, associations, or other relevant individuals.

Failure to comply could result in fines of up to NT$100,000 (US$3,000), with the same penalty applied to delayed responses or intentional concealment of pertinent information.

Lawmakers from Taiwan’s ruling Democratic Progressive Party throw balloons protesting the “evil laws” inside the Legislative Yuan on 28 May, as the opposition’s parliamentary reform bills had their third reading. Photo: EPA

The legislation requires the president to deliver an annual address on the state of the island each year before March 1 and respond to lawmakers’ questions. It also mandates that appointments to key government positions be made through open ballots.

Although parts of the legislation, including the expanded oversight powers, were proposed and supported by prominent DPP lawmakers when they were in opposition, the cabinet argues that it would undermine its administrative operations.

In a legislative meeting on Thursday, Cho Jung-tai, the Taiwanese premier, branded the reform as a “serious exploitation of power” by the opposition, saying the cabinet had no choice but to veto the entire package.

Cho insisted that the legislation violates the constitution by requiring the president to report to the legislature annually and answer questions., describing it as a “governance disruption” and proposing that it be reconsidered.

He also criticised the opposition lawmakers, accusing them of overstepping their boundaries and infringing on executive, judicial, and oversight authorities, as well as the basic rights of the public.

The opposition argues that the DPP’s complete control over the government and the legislature for the past eight years has seen it evolve into a “power monster that dictates everything in Taiwan” without any legislative oversight.

Taiwanese lawmakers holding placards raise their hands during a vote on the opposition-led parliamentary reform bills on May 28. Photo: EPA

Observers expect the island’s political divide to intensify as the DPP government finds itself drawn into escalating conflicts with the opposition-dominated legislature.

Huang Huei-hua, head of research at the Taiwan International Strategic Study Society think tank in Taipei, said the veto was “an attempt … to undermine the legislature’s authority by bypassing the checks and balances of the parliament”.

The Lai administration has used seven arguments to contest the bills, characterising them as “immoral and unconstitutional.” The opposition maintains it is legitimate to enact laws reinforcing legislative oversight over the government, she said.

In a bid to sway public perceptions, pro-DPP media figures are assertively voicing their perspectives on media platforms, instilling fear about potential penalties against ordinary people should the legislation be enacted, according to Huang.

“This political struggle has escalated into a media war of propaganda and psychological tactics, which is contributing to an atmosphere of insecurity in Taiwan,” she lamented.

“Both camps are disseminating information to fortify their positions and rallying their supporters to protest.”

Protesters outside Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan on May 24, 2024, as opposition lawmakers proceeded with a bill intended to curtail the powers of the new president. Photo: Bloomberg

Since the bills were introduced last month, supporters of both sides have been rallying outside the parliament and demonstrating in the streets, leading to even greater division.

Lai’s approval rating has seen a nearly 10-point drop since he took office in May, with the Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation’s most recent poll on Monday showing a dip to 48.2 per cent – down from 58 per cent a month ago.

“This represents a loss of approximately two million supporters in just one month, and serves as a serious warning signal,” according to foundation chairman Michael You Ying-lung.

You said the decline in Lai’s approval numbers could be partly attributed to the political unrest stemming from the conflict between the cabinet and the legislature since the elections.

The political instability and public anxiety incited by both the opposition parties and the DPP – with supporters urged to take to the streets in protest – were also factors, he said.

After just one month in office, the cabinet had already been hit by a storm of parliamentary reform “without any notable achievements so far”, You said.

“Mishandling of certain critical issues” by some government departments had also had an impact on Lai’s popularity, he added.

03:11

Mainland China launches PLA blockade around Taiwan, 3 days after William Lai speech

Mainland China launches PLA blockade around Taiwan, 3 days after William Lai speech

Discontent among the island’s populace has been intensified by the economics ministry’s decision to raise electricity rates – after intermittent short-term power outages in recent months – and an inability to curb rising house prices.

And last week, the island’s safety from attack was called into question when the coastguard failed to spot a speedboat – reportedly driven by a former PLA Navy captain – from the Chinese mainland until it arrived at a strategically sensitive river near Taipei.

Beijing regards Taiwan as part of its territory, to be reunited with the mainland by force, if necessary. The US, like most countries, does not recognise the island but is opposed to any attack on the island and is also its biggest arms supplier.

James Yifan Chen, a professor of diplomacy and international relations at Tamkang University in New Taipei, said the apparent unwillingness of Lai and his administration to cooperate with the parliamentary majority is contributing to his decline in popularity.

“Instead, as the party chair of the DPP, what he is doing now is [confronting] the opposition parties and disregarding majority rule,” Chen said. It was “not a very good start” to Lai’s aim for a commendable scorecard for his first 100 days in office, he added.

Chen said that the conflict “signals tough roads ahead for the relationship between the executive and the legislative branches”.

The Lai administration is also dealing with strained cross-strait relations after the new leader used his inauguration speech on May 20 to declare that the island and mainland were “not subordinate to each other”.

A provoked Beijing, which had already labelled Lai an “obstinate separatist, responded by simulating a blockade of the island in two days of war games that kicked off three days later.

“People in Taiwan expect their president to not only [reconcile] domestic political differences but also to stabilise cross-strait relations” rather than intensifying them, Chen said.

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! Pioneer Newz is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a Comment