The Samsung Exynos 1330 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 power multiple budget and midrange smartphones in the market. Both chipsets carry 5G capabilities, feature similar clock speeds and are comparably matched in synthetic benchmarks. So where do the differences lie? Find out below in our Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 695 comparison where we’ll examine the key differences in their specifications, AnTuTu, Geekbench, GFXBench, and PCMark scores, as well as the advantages of choosing one over the other.
Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 695: key differences
Exynos 1330 advantages over Snapdragon 695
- Exynos 1330 is fabricated on a 5nm node which may result in better battery efficiency than the 6nm node found on the Snapdragon 695.
- The Exynos chip has support for higher display pixel density for sharper content viewing.
- Exynos 1330 also supports advanced memory types such as LPDDR5 while the Snapdragon 695 is limited to LPDDR4x.
- The Exynos 1330 chip can capture and play videos in up to 4K resolution, which is not possible on Snapdragon 695.
Snapdragon 695 advantages over Exynos 1330
- Snapdragon 695 can run 3D tasks more efficiently due to a better GPU, as indicated by benchmark scores.
- The Snapdragon chip supports more satellite systems such as NavIC and QZSS as compared to Exynos 1330.
Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 695: AnTuTu scores compared
AnTuTu benchmark evaluates the chipset’s performance by testing the CPU, GPU, memory, and user experience (UX). The higher the score, the better the chipset is in particular aspects.
| ANTUTU (v10) | Exynos 1330 | Snapdragon 695 |
| AnTuTu score | 4,09,771 | 4,01,418 |
| CPU | 1,31,896 | 1,20,025 |
| GPU | 84,030 | 99,725 |
| Memory | 78,109 | 72,741 |
| UX | 1,15,736 | 1,08,927 |
*Scores are based on tests conducted by 91mobiles.
Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 695: Geekbench scores compared
Geekbench determines a chipset’s performance by running heavy tests in the background that test the single-core and multi-core prowess of the processor.
| GEEKBENCH SCORES | Exynos 1330 | Snapdragon 695 |
| Single-core | 772 | 829 |
| Multi-core | 2,123 | 2,019 |
Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 695: GFXBench scores compared
GFXBench is a cross-platform benchmarking app that measures and tests the ability to run 3D tasks and render detailed environments.
| Tests | Exynos 1330 | Snapdragon 695 |
| Manhattan (ran for 30 min) | 1,329 | 2,421 |
| T-Rex | 2,961 | 3,330 |
*Phones used for the test are Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Exynos 1330) and POCO X5 (Snapdragon 695)
Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 695: PCMark scores compared
PCMark attempts to replicate real-world modern office tasks. The benchmark tests the device’s battery’s endurance by running hours-long tests.
| Tests | Exynos 1330 | Snapdragon 695 |
| PCMark battery performance | 13 hours 8 minutes | 16 hours 6 minutes |
*Phones used for the test are Samsung Galaxy A14 5G (Exynos 1330) and POCO X5 (Snapdragon 695) equipped with a 5,000mAh battery.
Exynos 1330 vs Snapdragon 695: technical specifications
| BASIS | Exynos 1330 | Snapdragon 695 |
| Manufacturer | Samsung | TSMC |
| CPU cores | Octa-core (8) | Octa-core (8) |
| CPU structure | Cortex-A78x2 2.4GHz Cortex-A55x6 2.0GHz |
2×2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold 6×1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver |
| CPU architecture | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| Process node | 5nm | 6nm |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 | Adreno 619 |
| GPU APIs | OpenCL 2.0 and Vulkan 1.1 | OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, and Vulkan 1.1 |
| Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR4x |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.2 |
| Display resolution | FHD+ at 120Hz | FHD+ at 120Hz or HD+ at 120Hz |
| Display pixels | 2960×1440 | 1600×900 and 2520×1080 |
| Video capture | Up to 4K at 30FPS | Up to 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video playback | Up to 4K at 30FPS | Up to 1080p at 60FPS |
| Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Information unavailable | Qualcomm Spectra 346T |
| Single camera | Up to 108MP or 16MP + 16MP | Up to 108MP |
| Slow-motion video capture | Information unavailable | Up to 720p at 120FPS |
| WiFi | Wi-Fi 5 | Wi-Fi 4 and Wi-Fi 5 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Modem | Information unavailable | Snapdragon X51 |
| Cellular technology | 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G | 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G sub-6 GHz and mmWave |
| Satellite systems | GLONASS, Beidou, GPS, and Galileo | GLONASS, NavIC, Beidou, GPS, QZSS, and Galileo |
| NFC | Supported | Supported |
FAQs
Is Exynos 1330 good for gaming?
The Exynos 1330 should be reliable for running 2D and less graphic-intensive games. Pushing the processor to its limits could result in jitters and frame drops. The Snapdragon 695 on the other hand should be a tad better at running 3D tasks such as playing heavy games due to a better GPU. Since both are budget-oriented chipsets, don’t expect them to deliver an absolutely smooth gaming experience, especially for long durations.
Which is best, Exynos 1330 or Snapdragon 695?
The Exynos 1330 has an edge over the Snapdragon 695 in terms of efficient fabrication, video capture and playback capabilities, advanced RAM type, and a tad higher clock speeds which look better on paper. However, real-world performance would differ depending on how manufacturers tune both the chipsets. Exynos 1330 is found exclusively on Samsung phones while Snapdragon 695 powers several phones from different brands.
